Martech: Martech is Marketing Logo
  • Topics
    Transformation
    Operations
    Data
    Experience
    Performance
    Management
    Special Reports
    All Topics
  • Conference
  • Webinars
  • Intelligence Reports
  • White Papers
  • What is MarTech
    Mission
    Team
    Newsletter
    Search Engine Land
    Third Door Media

Processing...Please wait.

MarTech » Data » Attribution Should Be About Contribution Chains Rather Than Awarding Credit

Attribution Should Be About Contribution Chains Rather Than Awarding Credit

Marketers put a lot of time and energy into determining which channel gets credit for a conversion -- but contributor Soren Ryherd believes that this approach is missing the point.

Soren Ryherd on September 30, 2015 at 1:07 pm

links-gray-ss-1920

The conversation about attribution is all wrong. Even the name “attribution” conveys the wrong meaning. Much of the attribution discussion — and even the attribution models we use — focuses on dividing up the chain of touchpoints to determine which channel gets “credit.”

Yet multi-touchpoint engagement implies that the whole chain of touchpoints is what creates value — not each independent touchpoint.

Current attribution models, such as First-In, Last-In, Even Distribution, or custom weighted models, all look to discretize the value based on philosophical approaches.

For example, proponents of Last-In (if there are any… Bueller?) would argue that the last step in the journey should get the credit, as it is the closest step to value. First-In proponents argue that early steps are tied to the motivating or educational stages of engagement, and, therefore, deserve to be more highly valued.

The reality is, all of these are guesses. And we don’t have to guess. We can take the information from our data sources and tests to create attribution models based on empirical data regardless of assumptions.

[pullquote]But here’s the thing. Users don’t care about budget silos, departments or fiefdoms.[/pullquote]

It is time to shift the discussion, and our models, from dissecting touchpoint chains to “credit” individual channels,  towards reinforcing the tactics that create chains of value in the first place.

The current attribution discussion stems from over a century of channel-specific marketing, and a channel-specific worldview that has carried over into our digital programs, budgets, and even operational structures.

When the evolution of tracking data began revealing user engagement paths involving multiple channels, we stuck to our channel-centric view and attempted to shoehorn multi-channel data into our single-channel reports, tools, and execution. In larger media programs, this tied back to departmental budgets and siloed operations within marketing.

But here’s the thing.  Users don’t care about budget silos, departments or fiefdoms.  They care about their needs.

When value is created by multiple channel touchpoints, what users are telling us is that it is the combination of channels that they need for engagement. And it is becoming increasingly apparent that attribution models that attempt to discretize value over different channels without looking at the impact on the creation and support of the entire chain may not be as efficient as they appear.

Chain-Based Attribution

A completely different approach is to use Chain-Based Attribution.

Chain-Based Attribution looks at understanding the value of the chain by working backward from customer value, then making tactical decisions in valuing the touchpoints to maintain the entire chain.

Chain-Based Attribution is less concerned about the specific placement of the touchpoint, such as is used in First-In or Last-In models, as opposed to the fragility of the touchpoint. Protecting the chain is everything.

Most multi-touchpoint chains begin with a non-branded touch that exposes or reinforces the connection with a user and a brand. This can include non-branded search (paid or organic), display, social media, links, YouTube ads, or more.

Almost all chains end with a branded touchpoint, most commonly a brand search or a direct (No Referrer) visit, or remarketing exposure.  In the middle can be a mix of almost anything, including brand and non-brand, remarketing, and more.

Fragile Touchpoints

What makes a touchpoint or channel fragile in the touchpoint chain?  Which run the risk of not being present if we don’t tactically support them?

Almost always, auction-based paid media is the most fragile. The nature of the auction is that in a competitive field, not supporting paid media to the full value possible based on the value of a customer means that the channel is at risk of not being present.

If that touchpoint is no longer present, the chain no longer exists.  If the entire chain no longer exists, it cannot create value from those users that need that combination of touchpoints for engagement.

[pullquote]Protecting the chain is everything.[/pullquote]

Other factors contribute to fragility in touchpoint chains. For example, non-brand organic keywords that rank high on Search Engine Result Pages (SERPs) may be at risk in a page redesign.

Display, Video, and other highly interruptive media may be at risk because the initial engagement is at an impression level with no click ever being recorded in the touchpoint stack. Therefore, we may need to develop methods (such as statistical modeling) for valuing those types of media relative to the volume of touchpoint stacks that only show branded and direct touches.

In practice, Chain-Based Attribution most closely resembles First-In models, but for radically different reasons. First-In models assume higher value earlier in the chain because those touches are assumed to be “more motivating”.

Chain-based attribution doesn’t require assumptions about motivation, but instead supports highly fragile early auction-based touches because that is what is required to maintain chains that the data show create value.

Contribution Replaces Credit

With Chain-Based Attribution, contribution replaces credit in internal discussions about the deployment of resources. Marketers must recognize that combinations of channels, programs, and budgets create desired outcomes.

While this may sound daunting, the fact that Chain-Based Attribution puts outcomes first in valuing touchpoints, and only values the entire chain, actually makes it easier to have discussions on budgets, programs, and new initiatives that cross operational divides. Departments have to coordinate to create explicit chains of multi-touch engagement.

Chain-Based Attribution provides a clear outcome-driven philosophy of attacking attribution that can lead to readily apparent tactical approaches that maximize the value in multi-channel engagement.

Losing the fights over credit is just a bonus.


Opinions expressed in this article are those of the guest author and not necessarily MarTech. Staff authors are listed here.


New on MarTech

    Marketing operations talent is suffering burnout and turnover

    Antitrust bill could force Google, Facebook and Amazon to shutter parts of their ad businesses

    Unveiling our first MarTech Intelligence Report on email marketing platforms

    How product analytics can unite marketing and product teams to boost customer lifetime value

    Create a B2B GTM strategy that buyers, execs and revenue teams love

About The Author

Soren Ryherd
Soren Ryherd started as a research scientist, was a NASA graduate research fellow, and co-founded quantitative marketing firm Working Planet in 2003. Working Planet puts the math behind the marketing, connecting the dots from advertising to revenue and profits. In 2012, Soren was an inaugural Rhode Island Innovation Fellow, which launched The Retail Project RI, a for-profit venture that is aimed at building a stable and sustainable Main Street retail sector in Rhode Island. Soren works at the intersection of math, advertising, and business consulting, focusing on data-driven applications of marketing tactics directly tied to bottom-line growth. Soren is also a frequent speaker on data-driven digital advertising tactics, strategy, and business innovation.

Related Topics

Data

Get the daily newsletter digital marketers rely on.

Processing...Please wait.

See terms.

ATTEND OUR EVENTS

June 7, 2022: Master Classes

September 28-29, 2022: Fall

Start Discovering Now: Spring

Learn More About Our MarTech Events

June 14-15, 2022: SMX Advanced (virtual)

November 14-15, 2022: SMX Next (virtual)

March 8-9, 2022: Master Classes (virtual)

Learn More About Our SMX Events

Webinars

Take a Crawl, Walk, Run Approach to Multi-Channel ABM

Content Comes First: Transform Your Operations With DAM

Dominate Your Competition with Google Auction Insights and Search Intelligence

See More Webinars

Intelligence Reports

Enterprise SEO Platforms: A Marketer’s Guide

Enterprise Identity Resolution Platforms

Email Marketing Platforms: A Marketer’s Guide

Enterprise Sales Enablement Platforms: A Marketer’s Guide

Enterprise Digital Experience Platforms: A Marketer’s Guide

Enterprise Call Analytics Platforms: A Marketer’s Guide

See More Intelligence Reports

White Papers

Reputation Management For Healthcare Organizations

Unlock the App Marketing Potential of QR Codes

Realising the power of virtual events for demand generation

The Progressive Marketer’s Ultimate Events Strategy 2022 Worksheet

CMO Guide: How to Plan Smart and Pivot Fast

See More Whitepapers

Receive daily marketing news & analysis.

Processing...Please wait.

Topics

  • Transformation
  • Operations
  • Data
  • Experience
  • Performance
  • Management
  • All Topics
  • Home

Our Events

  • MarTech
  • Search Marketing Expo - SMX

About

  • What is MarTech
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Marketing Opportunities
  • Staff

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • RSS

© 2022 Third Door Media, Inc. All rights reserved.