Facebook’s Q4 ad revenue swells despite decreases in time spent and North American daily audience
What marketers need to know about Facebook's Q4 2017 earnings report.
Tim Peterson on February 1, 2018 at 9:25 am | Reading time: 5 minutes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66e8e/66e8e089e6a4161fb97a08d9986584165cb03f8d" alt="Facebook Money Revenue Dollars2 Ss 1920 Picjsb"
Business is still booming
So how is Facebook able to make more money despite having potentially fewer opportunities to show people ads? Because Facebook has apparently been able to convince advertisers to pay more for the ads it can show, likely thanks to its continued emphasis on measuring its ads’ ability to return actual business results, such as product sales, to advertisers. “A year ago we saw mobile conversions — actions taken on a mobile website after viewing an ad on Facebook — surpass desktop conversions for the first time. In 2017, mobile conversions continued to accelerate,” Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg said during the company’s earnings call. In Q4, the average amount of money that brands paid Facebook per ad increased by 43 percent year over year, continuing an annual pricing increase that has been going on since at least Q1 2015, when Facebook’s average price per ad swelled by 285 percent year over year. By contrast, the number of ads that Facebook served in the quarter inched up by 4 percent year over year, the lowest mark since Q3 2015, when the figure had declined by 10 percent. This ad-pricing growth appears to have countered Facebook’s ad load issue that would cause the company’s advertising revenue growth to decelerate as it maxed out the number of ads it could squeeze into people’s feeds. For more than a year, Facebook issued these warnings, and for more than a year, Facebook has been able to delay any significant deceleration. In the fourth quarter of 2017, Facebook’s advertising revenue increased by 48 percent year over year to $12.8 billion. And the company’s total revenue similarly swelled, by 47 percent year over year to $13.0 billion. Mobile increased its majority share of Facebook’s ad revenue. The company raked in $11.4 billion from mobile ads, up 53 percent year over year to account for 89 percent of Facebook’s overall ad revenue. However, while its desktop advertising business contributes a smaller and smaller share of its revenue, it continues to grow. In Q4, Facebook’s desktop advertising revenue rose by 17 percent year over year to $1.4 billion.What to ‘watch’ for
However, Facebook’s future revenue growth could be hampered if its audience and usage continue to decline. But Facebook appears to be trying to preempt that possibility. In deemphasizing viral videos, Facebook will show people fewer of the videos that they’re likely to stop watching when a mid-roll ad interrupts their viewing experience. Instead, Facebook will try to steer people to its video hub, Watch. Because people would go to Watch with the specific intention to watch videos, they are more likely to be willing to sit through an ad break. And since Facebook is adding features to get people to interact with others watching a show — such as listing what someone’s friends watch and encouraging group viewing — Facebook’s recent algorithm change to encourage “meaningful social interactions” could further fuel this type of viewership. All these efforts, and as a result of Watch videos’ longer lengths, are aimed at increasing the amount of time people spend on Facebook, as well as Facebook’s ad revenue. On the other hand, Facebook’s business could be hurt in other ways. After North America, Facebook’s second-largest region in terms of revenue is Europe. But that revenue may take a hit later this year, when the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) takes effect in May. At that point, people in the European Union will be confronted with the information Facebook collects about them and must decide whether they are OK with the company doing so. During Facebook’s earnings call, Sandberg acknowledged that “some users might opt out of our ads targeting tools” and that those users may use Facebook less often as a result of being made more aware of Facebook’s data practices. “We’re not forecasting a big impact here,” she said. “There’s some risk, and we’re watching closely.”Contributing authors are invited to create content for MarTech and are chosen for their expertise and contribution to the martech community. Our contributors work under the oversight of the editorial staff and contributions are checked for quality and relevance to our readers. The opinions they express are their own.
Related stories