Another consumer privacy issue in the age of GDPR: Session replay scripts
A Princeton University study finds that such tracking of user browsing can collect and distribute a lot of confidential info.
For companies complying with the upcoming General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), it’s not just about a user’s name, email address or cookie.
A recent post from Princeton University researchers points to the practice by some websites of running session replay scripts without telling users:
These scripts record your keystrokes, mouse movements, and scrolling behavior, along with the entire contents of the pages you visit, and send them to third-party servers. Unlike typical analytics services that provide aggregate statistics, these scripts are intended for the recording and playback of individual browsing sessions, as if someone is looking over your shoulder.
The study looked at seven of the most popular session replay providers — Yandex, FullStory, Hotjar, UserReplay, Smartlook, Clicktale and SessionCam. Among the top 50,000 sites on Alexa, 482 employed session replay services.
Session replays are intended to highlight usability issues, show the relationship of one navigational choice to another and find out if sessions with similar types of goals take similar paths, among other objectives.
These replays show the screen exactly as the user would see it, with the cursor movements and clicks, pages shown, interactions undertaken and so on. Customer service departments, for instance, might use such replays to better understand the bottlenecks users might have in self-answering certain questions.
But the Princeton study, the first in a series of “No Boundaries” posts about how third-party scripts on sites extract personal info, shows that session replay scripts can reveal much more sensitive kinds of information.
A given session, for instance, can reveal which medical condition a user is interested in finding out about, or it can include confidential information — such as email addresses or credit card numbers — that are entered into online forms.
This confidential information can be transmitted to the third-party services. The Princeton study notes that the services often offer manual and automated redaction tools to remove the collection of sensitive info, but avoiding capturing such data on dynamically generated webpages would require that the site owner analyze the server-side code — and do so every time the code is updated.
To test the redaction tools, Princeton set up test pages and installed replay scripts from six of the seven providers.
It found that passwords were often included, such as from mobile-friendly logins, and that the kinds of redacted fields differed by provider. Yandex, for instance, doesn’t redact credit card number fields, while FullStory does.
Brandon Dixon, VP of product at cybersecurity firm RiskIQ, told me that session replay scripts should be opt-out by default so that users in the post-GDPR age would have to actively give their consent each time.
He also recommended that session replay providers be more transparent and uniform in the kinds of information they collect, how it is being used and how it is being stored.
Opinions expressed in this article are those of the guest author and not necessarily MarTech. Staff authors are listed here.