SaaS buyers frustrated, revenue leaders struggling: Wednesday’s daily brief

B2B buyers want their hands on the wheel.

Chat with MarTechBot

MarTech’s daily brief features daily insights, news, tips, and essential bits of wisdom for today’s digital marketing leader. If you would like to read this before the rest of the internet does, sign up here to get it delivered to your inbox daily.

Good morning, Marketers. When buyers are moving along on their journey, they want the wheel in their hands.

In today’s newsletter, we look at the frustrations many buyers have with their buying experiences. Much of it has to do with marketing and sales overreach, especially in B2B. Sometimes less is more. The only way to know for sure is to have good customer data across functions. Too many silos can lead to greater frustration.

Further down, we see how the same data obstacles can also lead to internal confusion, in sales forecasting specifically. Sure, the pandemic has been an unexpected challenge to revenue, but all the more reason to champion organizational and technological change.

But first, we have a fascinating case study. When Facebook ads got too expensive, Chicago-based Tovala turned to performance-driven CTV spots to promote their delivered meal kits. The result is an update to that classic American staple, the TV dinner.

Chris Wood,

Editor

How performance CTV ads are helping Tovala sell meals that cook themselves 

Like many pandemic-inspired consumer dining trends, the meal kit delivery services (MKDS) market has seen tremendous growth over the past year. That growth has been fueled by limited dining out options combined with consumers’ desire for healthy convenient meals. 

One of those services, Chicago-based Tovala, is offering meal kit delivery with an interesting twist. Meal delivery services come in two flavors – Heat & Eat or Cook & Eat. The former refers to prepared, fully-cooked meals which are delivered to your door and don’t require cooking beyond warming up the food. Tovala combines the Heat & Eat approach with the Cook & Eat approach via the use of a smart oven that enables customers to create home-cooked meals requiring minimal prep in roughly 20 minutes or less.

Tovala credits Facebook ads for helping scale their initial audience and raising brand awareness. But the rising cost of Facebook ads led them to diversify their channel mix.Tovala worked with MNTN, a CTV performance marketing platform, to quickly get up and running with a CTV pilot campaign. MNTN is a self-serve ad management platform akin to Facebook or Google Ads, but with a focus on direct TV advertising. Campaigns are highly data-driven and optimized over time based on performance.

Tovala wanted to test CTV because they were looking for a medium that helped them reach new audiences and they found that it delivered — in spades. Ad delivery costs like CPM were lower than on other platforms and overall acquisition costs were up to 60% more effective.

Read more here. 

SaaS buyers: The process is frustrating  

Over 90% of B2B buyers want to communicate about and negotiate offers, while almost 80% are frustrated by the B2B purchasing experience. That’s according to a new report from Qwilr, the proposal and quote design solution for B2B sales.

SaaS Buyer Experience 2021” questioned 114 U.S.-based respondents, almost a third of whom work in the technology/software sector. Frustration was based around excessive paperwork and too many calls or meetings with sales reps. The buying experience is complicated and has too many steps (35%), and takes too long (26%). No fewer than 59% of respondents called for faster, easier processes.

Against that background, it’s no surprise that there’s support for self-service options with reduced sales involvement (25%) and that a healthy proportion wants to be able to conduct demos themselves or try the product for free (40%) and wants to do their own research and product comparisons (over 30%). Peer reviews come in only second to cost when it comes to influence on final purchase decision. The report concludes: “Buyer conveniences can accelerate the deal.”

Why we care. One takeaway from reports like this has to be that the pandemic got sales reps out of customers’ hair. Perhaps that’s not a kind reflection on sales, but it’s clear that the trend towards purchasers conducting their own research and (where available) trials has only accelerated. And after 15 months of doing research and discovery, and making consumer purchases online, why grapple with a much more complicated process when it comes to B2B?

Of course, it might be said that a multi-thousand dollar software investment is bound to have some complexity to it. But that doesn’t mean it isn’t incumbent on vendors to smooth the path as much as possible. It is notable that it’s still less than half of purchasers who want to avoid sales-conducted demos and enjoy a self-service process: but there’s little doubt that those numbers will grow.

Common struggles for revenue leaders

Only 15% of revenue leaders are very satisfied with their forecasting process, according to a recent Benchmark Study by revenue intelligence provider InsightSquared. And even worse, a full 91% of respondents said their predicted forecast was off by 6% or more.

Certainly, the pandemic affected forecasts in a dramatic way, which is all the more reason to look hard at the kinds of tools companies can implement, as well as other steps they can take to improve forecasting.

CRMs. 80% of respondents were using two or more forecasting platforms, and over half were using three or more. CRMs are the top tool for forecasting automation. However, less than a third said they used CRMs for opportunity scoring, an important forecasting metric.

Automation. Over half the companies surveyed didn’t have forecasting automation. This makes organizations more susceptible to human error and bad data when everything is manually inputted into an Excel spreadsheet.

Involving sales reps. Since they’re closest to the deals, sales reps need to be brought into the forecasting process. But only a quarter of businesses surveyed said this was the case in their org.

Why we care. When organizations use a number of different tools for a single operation, as in the case of forecasting platforms, this requires an even greater amount of human attention and buy-in. It’s easy to see how morale could be affected and how revenue opportunities could be lost. The consequences for siloed data and a bumpy digital transformation are many, not least of all dropped sales. It appears from this survey that those responsible for driving revenue (which increasingly includes marketers) need to have a thumb on the pulse of their company’s stack. The business’s forecasting could offer a sign that greater changes need to be made in marketing or sales. 


About the author

Kim Davis
Staff
Kim Davis is currently editor at large at MarTech. Born in London, but a New Yorker for almost three decades, Kim started covering enterprise software ten years ago. His experience encompasses SaaS for the enterprise, digital- ad data-driven urban planning, and applications of SaaS, digital technology, and data in the marketing space. He first wrote about marketing technology as editor of Haymarket’s The Hub, a dedicated marketing tech website, which subsequently became a channel on the established direct marketing brand DMN. Kim joined DMN proper in 2016, as a senior editor, becoming Executive Editor, then Editor-in-Chief a position he held until January 2020. Shortly thereafter he joined Third Door Media as Editorial Director at MarTech.

Kim was Associate Editor at a New York Times hyper-local news site, The Local: East Village, and has previously worked as an editor of an academic publication, and as a music journalist. He has written hundreds of New York restaurant reviews for a personal blog, and has been an occasional guest contributor to Eater.

Get the must-read newsletter for marketers.